This week I received an email from someone suggesting that we get together to network and learn about each other's businesses. Like me, she lives in Seattle.
I enthusiastically emailed my reply. Then I received this response:
"I apologize for this automatic reply to your email.
"To control spam, I now allow incoming messages only from senders I have approved beforehand.
"If you would like to be added to my list of approved senders, please fill out the short request form (see link below). Once I approve you, I will receive your original message in my inbox. You do not need to resend your message. I apologize for this one-time inconvenience."
The link below the message took me to a screen in which I had to verify my name and email address and type the wavy letters I saw in a box.
It took me only a minute to read the message and take the action. The one-time inconvenience was brief. But why inconvenience others at all, especially if we are reaching out to them?
I suggest that people who use such spam-control methods add people to their whitelist (their list of people whose email will be accepted) before they send them email. If they do so, replying will be hassle-free for those they want to correspond with.
What do you suggest?
Lynn
Syntax Training


I totally agree with you, Lynn! The sender could have at least given recipients a heads-up:
"After you send your reply, please don't be alarmed if you receive an automated anti-spam security message. It's quick and painless--promise!"
Posted by: JJB | September 11, 2009 at 11:00 AM
JJB, I like your solution. It's a polite, friendly forewarning. Thanks for taking the time to compose it.
Posted by: Lynn | September 12, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Great topic to cover Lynn! It is not only a matter of inconvenience for the recipient, but one risks the other side not following through even though such minimal effort is required.
I have a couple articles on my Business E-mail Etiquette site that you might find helpful with this topic, including links to how to whitelist and not look spammy (the number one reason e-mails are blocked).
http://www.businessemailetiquette.com/index.php?s=whitelist
HTH! Looking forward to more of you posts!
At your service,
Judith
Posted by: Judith | September 13, 2009 at 09:34 AM
I definitely agree with you Lynn, and Judith. As I was reading this post, I was thinking to myself that I would never follow that link for fear that it was a phishing scam. Unless I know the person or service emailing me I am just as wary as they were.
I think whitelisting before sending out an email is a must - if you want to solicit my help, business, or just opinions, I don't want to be inconvenienced.
Posted by: S Freeman | September 13, 2009 at 11:32 PM
I hate these spam control tools to begin with. They essentially shift the burden of spam control from the receiver to the sender, which I think is bad practice. Most e-mail programs come with a way for the user to designate that an e-mail is spam and from that time on will block the e-mail address. The receiver should do this, rather than force the sender through extra steps. More than once I've decided not to bother with this process. I can't imagine I'm the only one.
Posted by: elizabeth stockton | September 15, 2009 at 10:52 AM
Thanks, everyone, for your views.
Judith or others, will you please tell me what "HTH" means?
Posted by: Lynn | September 19, 2009 at 02:31 PM