« Proofreading Slogan: Print Before Sending | Main | Help for People Who Make Signs »

February 10, 2011

Comments

Cathy Miller

It reminds of hand-written letters with hearts above every i. Blech.

I don't think you are overreacting, but then there are some who find it totally innocent. I'm curious why you categorize it as a business email if it was about carpooling. XXXOOO on a business email would be a major problem.

Lynn Gaertner-Johnston

Hi, Cathy. Hearts over every I? I haven't seen those in a long while. They remind me of middle school, but I have seen adults using them.

I referred to the email in question as a "personal-business email" because it dealt with personal business. You are right--XXXOOO on a true business email could be disastrous.

Lynn

Jen

Hahahaha!
Business or personal, it's still hilarious, in a bad way.

I wonder how the mother would respond if, for fun, your husband signed XXXOOO in reply!

Perhaps that might give her a taste of the message she's giving off.

Karla

LOL! I was going to suggest what "Jen" said, but that could backfire. It reminds me of that "Friends" episode where Chandler pretended to be interested in Phoebe and vice versa, to see who caved in first. (Neither was attracted to the other.) This is why I turned off my auto signature on my personal email account. (It's required at work--but no XXOOs are allowed. :-))

Lynn Gaertner-Johnston

Hi, Jen and Karla. I'm glad you got a good laugh out of the saga.

I don't think Michael is willing to try sending XXXOOO back to the mother. Who knows where that might lead?

Lynn

LesterSmith

The irony is that automated signs of affection like these end up coming across as false and manipulative as Teller's smile. (Odd fact: He legally changed his name to just "Teller.") A writer who can't personalize a message ending shouldn't pretend that level of warmth.

Cheers,

Les

Joanne

I agree we should all be careful with automatic signatures. I have a slightly take on the issue. In our office we are encouraged to add a "tag line" to our auto signatures that amounts to a mini sales pitch. ("Do you need help with XXX? Our new XXX service can help!"). Now everytime I get an email from a co-worker I get their tag line. There doesn't seem to be any consideration for who the email is going to or what their needs are.

Val Span

I can understand your irritation! But besides being inappropriate for any email outside of family and close friends, a sign of affection becomes devoid of meaning if it's added automatically. It's like the "Love you" at the end of every telephone call to a spouse or child. It becomes no more meaningful than "Later."

(Did I just kick a hornet's nest?)

Lynn Gaertner-Johnston

Thanks, Lester, for your good point about affection coming across as false and manipulative.

If you see this message, will you please elaborate on Teller? I don't know which one you are referring to.

Joanne, I have been in your situation. It would be helpful if people realized they can edit their auto signatures on individual messages. Although it might take two seconds, your colleagues could erase a tag line for an internal message.

Thanks for adding your views!
Lynn

Lynn Gaertner-Johnston

Hi, Val. You and I were posting at the same time. I agree, as does Lester (comment above), that auto-affection is meaningless. My husband often jokingly says "Love you. Mean it" to illustrate just the situation you describe.

Hornet's nest? We'll see!

Lynn

LesterSmith

Hi, Lynn. The Teller I mentioned is the silent half of Penn & Teller, a pair of stage magicians, social commentators, and general debunkers. Penn does the huckster spiel during their act, while the cherubic Teller climbs into death traps while maintaining a fatuous smile.

Lynn Gaertner-Johnston

Lester, thank you for explaining. Now I understand your comment perfectly.

Lynn

markustoday

Hi Lester, LOL amazing story, I use a JPEG file for my signature which I just copy and paste onto the document so there is no room for error. XOXOXO

Lynn Gaertner-Johnston

Ha! Is XOXOXO part of your signature?

Lynn

The comments to this entry are closed.